Transparency · Grading rubric
Last updatedRubric v1.2
How we rate.
The same four-tier rubric — A through D — applies to ingredients, products, and supplements alike. The criteria differ slightly by category, but the badge stays the same so you can read it at a glance across the site. The full dossier (principles, conflicts of interest, review cadence, corrections, funding) lives on the methodology page.
The four-tier rubric.
Adjustments for products.
A product Tier reflects the formulation as a whole — not just the active. We assess: in-spec dose of the active, vehicle quality (penetration / stability), realistic price-per-use, and complete ingredient list (we down-grade for known sensitisers in unnecessary positions).
- Active concentration verified
- Vehicle pH where relevant
- Compatibility with claimed routine
- No known issue ingredients without reason
Adjustments for supplements.
Supplement tiers weight bioavailability, third-party testing, and human (not in-vitro) outcomes more heavily. Anything Rx-only carries a parallel safety review by Dr. Sundeep before publication.
- Human RCTs, not in-vitro
- Standardised extract documented
- Realistic real-world dose
- Drug-interaction and pregnancy review
Read the full dossier
The principles that predate the rubric, our conflicts-of-interest declaration, the weekly/monthly/quarterly/annual review cadence, the corrections policy, and the source of every rupee that funds the publication — all live in the methodology dossier.
Read the methodology dossier →